That was awesome...

So I'm taking a small break from Shadowrun since I have a Gears tournament soon. So I start a ranked match (with my Gamebattles partner Oldreg) and after the first round our two partners leave (we still won). I asked if the other team was lagging and they say not at all. Anyway, next round we RAPE all four of them. We kill two each and the three on the other team that knew each other just LEAVE! Yes, we rock.

All hope in the world is lost...

IGN gave Shadowrun a 6.8.

I'll never read another review again. It's ridiculously inaccurate. Although you could tell that he understood how to play the game and spent time with it.

I think it's the 60 buck price tag without single player.

Whatever, it's still a freaking blast.

I'm a little upset...

...with Gamespot. Giving Shadowrun a 6.9 is ridiculous. I'll write my own review and elaborate later, but I want to note two reasons why it doesn't matter.

1. The review is unclear and fabricated. Not to mention the reviewer obviously didn't spend ANY time playing the game, granted he didn't even have the well rounded achievement (play on each map) when the review was written. There is only nine maps. And they cycle.

2: I PLAYED with Gamespotting. I told my friend Sneaky "hey look, it's the gamespot.com account!" He replied with 'cool." So anyway, he sucked. A few rounds later Sneaky announced "I'm throwing strangle on the artifact. Stay away." He then LEAPS into the strange and gets shot in the head. Sneaky swears at him multiple times (he has a hot temper) and gamespotting then left the game. The guy had no idea what he was doing, which was surprising.

Please don't let these imbeciles (who also gave the really awesome Wii Sports a bad review, as they bowled SITTING DOWN) talk you out of buying a game of the year for 2007 nominee. Trust me. This game is a blast. Demo June 6 if you don't wanna take my word for it.